Friday, May 04, 2007
Movie Review | Spiderman 3 sucks!
Well, it was bound to happen. After the first two movies made over 1.6 billion dollars at the box office, one would expect that the egos of the director, the stars, and even the writers would spin out of control. It did and it resulted in a sub-standard movie that seems to have been created by committee.
I am big fan of the Spiderman comic books and really like the way the characters are presented, especially the protagonist. He is nerdy, dorky and with awesome super-powers, but with a biting sarcasm which he uses really well to frustrate his opponents as well as a defense mechanism when things start to go wrong - both in his "professional" as well as personal life. That sarcasm and humour, the quintessential traits that sets Spiderman apart from the rest of the comic universe is completely lacking in the movie versions - all three of them. And that tarnishes the character quite a bit. But to be completely honest, its just as well. Considering the acting abilities (or lack of it thereof) of Toby Maguire, one must understand that there is no way that he can carry of a "funny" Spiderman.
Anyways, that apart, I went into the movie with a lot of expectations. I even believed that I will go back and watch it in a day or two at the local IMAX theater, simply, to see the obvious, awesome graphics. Yes, that's right obvious! In a world where CGI has progressed to being indistinguishable from reality, one can see what is real and what isn't in this movie. Sometimes the graphics are tardy and overdone. The action sequences are too fast and all over the place for ordinary humans to follow, make sense, or even be in awe. Things rush by so fast that one can easily get bored. Hey, if I can't follow what's going on with the fast blurry stuff zig-zagging on screen, then I might as well concentrate on the pop-corn at hand and the pretty girl sitting next to me.
And to think that they spent close to a half a billion dollars on this movie! Most expensive movie on the planet and all of it down the drain. Well if they spent even a small fraction of that money and expensive graphics to fix Tobey Maguire's complete lack of talent at emoting, then well, this movie would have been ten times as good. Let's get this straight - the only expression he can put on is one of a dopey, goofy character. Anything more complicated seems to be well out of his bag of tricks. By the way, there are two attributes that he should never attempt and he seems to overdose on them in this movie - one is trying to be emotional/sad while the other is trying to be "cool"/suave. And not surprisingly, he fails miserably on both counts.
We see a sad Peter Parker on two occasions : first, when Mary Jane claims to break up with him and again when his friend Harry Osborne has been critically injured. On both occasions he is in tears and let me warn you - it is not a pretty sight. Its like watching something horrible but being unable to turn your eyes away. In fact the audience was gasping in horror at the pathetic exhibition of emotion from Tobey Maguire.
The other disturbing aspect of the movie is when Venom takes over Peter Parker/Spiderman. Venom, an alien parasite, is supposed to bring out the worst characteristics in its host with the dark side taking over the host's personality. In Peter Parker it is supposed to make him more angry, more of a womaniser, more deadly, more powerful, less moral, etc. Well the problem is that in this movie, the character of Peter Parker is played by Tobey Maguire and angry, immoral and suave he is not. He is supposed to walk with an air about himself, make random passes at women, dress in a more dark, more stylish way, wear his hair differently and cut the rug in a mean way with some stylish dance moves at a jazz club. To be very polite, Tobey Maguire is not a John Travolta or a Patrick Swayze. He completely lacks the panache required to exhibit a "dark side" and it comes off as being extremely funny and comical. Unfortunately that effect was not intentional.
Topher Grace (of "The 70s show" fame) plays his rival for a job at the Daily Bugle and subsequently becomes infected by Venom. Suffice to say that acting was never his strong point. He seems to be just another Tobey Maguire - able to play the dorky goof-off in the sitcom but not quite making the cut for the big screen especially in action flicks. Well, at least he is better at humour that Tobey Maguire. Hmmm...maybe Topher Grace as Spiderman would have been an interesting experiment - at least he can carry off that sarcasm part well.
Of course, my biggest gripe with any big-screen adaptation (which wasn't as evident in the first two movies) is a distinct divergence from the comic book (Spiderman universe) storyline. For example, the reason Peter Parker meets Gwen Stacy (in the books at least) is because she studies with him and then is taken in my Aunt May when her father is killed in the line of duty. Both Gwen Stacy and her father receive about 5 minutes of footage and might as well have never been in the movie to begin with - their roles are pointless as far as Spiderman 3 goes.
Of yeah, I almost forgot - the overdose of drama and soap-opera'ish storylines. This movie has just too much of it, and considering that this is an action movie that is unacceptable. In fact, if someone had walked in to the movie about 15 minutes of its start and then watched the next half an hour, he would be puzzled and would think, "did I walk into the the wrong movie? I thought this was an action blockbuster. This looks and feels like a chick flick?" This is especially relevant, because as I mentioned above, most of the actors in the movie fell flat while trying to carry off the serious "acting" stuff that they're supposed to do when they are in front of a camera.
One other big problem with this movie - the direction and screenplay. There is no flow between the various events and scenes. A lot of unrelated and unnecessary parts made the cut. It seems like the entire package was put together in a hurry. Not hard to believe considering the enormous budget - I guess it must have been ballooning at an alarming rate and the studio must have put its foot down and forced Sam Raimi's hand to finish it in a hurry. Or, perhaps he was just bored with the entire thing. As a friend put it - maybe the actors, the director and crew were so tired of the entire thing that they decided to kill the movie franchise by doing a bad job!
Perhaps the guy who made (and markets) the Dyson vacuum cleaners might sell more of them if he changed his tagline to - "Dyson: sucks as much as Spiderman 3"!
_________________
Well, where would the world be without its share of idiots...sigh!
PS: HOW THE HELL CAN SOMEONE TOTALLY SCREW UP A MOVIE WITH VENOM IN IT!?
save your money people.
Oh, and you forgot to mention how endlessly confusing it is that in a movie "featuring" Venom, why any time whatsoever, let alone so much, was spent on a waste of a character like Sandman. Thomas Hayden Church has always been a great actor (except in Sideways, ironically the only thing most people know him from), but I just DO NOT CARE about him. You'd think they were scrapping the bottom of the barrel in so far as Spidey villains go, but then you're reminded that Venom (best Spidey villain created in the last 30 years) is in the movie.
Then you wonder why it wasn't the whole movie.
I could understand the arguments that Venom wouldn't be right for a movie. It was a complicated, extended comic book storyline in its original format, and perhaps it would have to be compressed so heavily in a movie format, that it would be worth doing.
Instead?
They make an attempt to tell this grand, complicated story... and on top of how difficult it would have been to do convincingly in a 120 minute film, they pile it on top of what seemed like a completely different movie already about the Green Goblin, AND the Sandman.
Focus Raimi. Focus.
I saw this episode of "reel talk" on NBC last Sunday and the female host (Alison was it) complain about this movie. Her main gripe was, get this,
"this movie is too long with all the excessive ACTION sequences. They should have cut down the action and special effects and paid more attention to the tender side of the story!!!"
And she was being serious mind you. Someone forgot to tell her that this was an action blockbuster based on a superhero legendary in the graphic novel universe!!! But then again, I'm not surprised that she got confused - most people who have seen this movie are confused as to whether this is a chick flick or not!
I do agree that some of the acting was a little 'suspect' and that a lot of changes were made in order for the film to appeal to a wider audience but you have to remember that films are made to entertain... and make money.
The only change I would make to this film to make it even better would be more Venom. Spider-Man should have been pawned in a short battle and had to retreat. Then Venom could team up with Sandman if not at all for the final showdown.
I think you should go back and watch the film again and try and get involved with the story a little more and try to understand 'feelings' if that's comprehendable to you of course.
and on that note
when does art lose its expression and become exploited for by money giants?
oh, it cost that much money huh? an expensive piece of shit, is still a piece of shit. that kind of reminds me about how boring and uncreative some (not all) new video games are, they kinda seem... the same as the other boring one?
but ill buy shit if thats all your selling
im going out on a limb here so don't expect me to be right just making you yak!
I think you should go back and watch the film again and try and get involved with the story a little more and try to understand 'feelings' if that's comprehendable to you of course.
As I said, this movie is a chick flick (what with the sappy 'feelings' and all) and having had the agony to sit through the nonsensical movie once, I don't think I will do so again. There's no need to get personal on this - as you said yourself, my opinion is different from yours. You're welcome to disagree
As for greatest comic book adaptations, please watch Batman Begins, if you haven't done so already - it is a really good adaptation of the Batman comic book series and it deals with "feelings" in the right way - showing the personal conflicts and anguish of Bruce Wayne and his transformation to the darker Batman. It was executed perfectly and the audience was never bored, or disgusted as in the new Spidey movie. Hey, one look at Tobey Maguire's pathetic exhibition at showing his "feelings" was enough to see that this movie was hitting rock bottom in the first 15 minutes!
Besides, with all the bad guys and various storylines inter-twining, this movie could be nothing but a mess!
But that was the ONE thing Batman Begins got wrong, and it was what... five minutes of the overall movie?
Spiderman 3 got just about as much right, as Batman Begins got wrong.
You just don't have Venom in a movie thats actually about Sandman.
That just rubs it in everyones face that we COULD be seeing a Venom movie, but instead are watching a movie about a sandbox come to life.
Its not even like Sandman offered more special effects opportunities. Venom done right would be a special effects extravaganza (to use a very tired metaphor).
Yawn.
Then came the 3rd installment... Wow! What a disappointment. Let me see... "Honey - I know you are a superhero who is responsible for stopping crime in NEW YORK on a moment's notice - and I know I said I would be with you no matter what... but... I'm not having a good time at work, and you don't seem to notice. So - off you go, while I seek solace from the spoiled-brat rich friend of ours - you know, just to HURT you for all that BAD stuff you did to me."
If this movie did ANYTHING, it showed MJ to be completely shallow and unworthy of such "regard" as Peter shows for her.
The "Rico Suave" ensemble was patently ridiculous. "Ooooh... you combed your hair down in front of your face - you BAD BOY." Ludicrous.
Thank goodness there won't be a 4th.
FAILURE FAILURE FAILURE. I think we should all get together and demand a national refund.
Instead? Let's regress back to an 8th-grade mentality when it was "cool" to hurt someone who hurt you. It goes without saying that Toby's attempt at "Rico Suave" belonged back in the days when the Spiderman comics were first written... not in 2007. I honestly hope that McGuire was in a movie theater when this premiered and heard the unanimous "what the hell?" when the credits started rolling.
I wont even go into the pathetic representations of our villains, because it seems to have been accurately said in here. One thing I would like to point out is that Venom needs to go off the diet... and for the love of decency, Kirsten Dunst NEEDS a bra!
(p.s. yes I'm anonymous, but I don't have an account and this is the only time I'll probably be posting, so I didn't see a need to take 10 seconds to create an identity)
PS kirsten is hot not ugly!!!
Links to this post:
<< Home

























